Rules for Radicals

     With the firestorm of ACORN controversy as of late, there has been an unraveling of sorts on the political left. Ann Coulter in her book accurately describes the totem pole of liberal victimology. It is quite simple really, in order to champion the disenfranchised, you must yourself remain a victim. For example, if a woman murders her abusive husband, the liberal will spin the events in such a manner so that her status a victim will clear her of the wrongdoing, (the sex card) when the fact remains that all murder is wrong. With ACORN however, they represent the poor, (the class card) as long as they're not white, and blacks, as long as they're not rich. (the race card) In the realm of liberal ideology, race trumps sex. Why else would the media jump ship during the democratic primary? Here you have Hillary Clinton, a rich white woman from an affluent background and an extensive background in the political limelight, juxtaposed to Barrack Obama, a black man from a poor family and a bit of an unknown on the national stage, other than liberalism 101, poor black trumps rich white. Hillary was immediately thrown under the bus by the media, and Obama was portrayed as the savior of the disenfranchised. Or was he?
When faced with tough questions about the economy, what was the response from democratic officials? "We inherited a deficit from Bush, the bush deficit, the bush economy et cetera" (remove yourself from responsibility by maintaining your status as a victim) Look at the statements he's made here over healthcare. With one hand, he champions the poor and the elderly, but misrepresents some facts in order to push the agenda. Upon careful examination of the statements and the actions of ACORN, they claim to champion the disenfranchised with one hand, and with the other attempt to usurp power. They defend their employees with their lips, and throw them to the wolves with their hands. There is a liberal behind every double standard. And the biggest double standard is yet to come.
Enter Sarah Palin, love her or hate her, you defiantly heard of her. Here is a woman (liberals love to champion womens issues) who is a political power player, and now she is the pariah of liberal politics, and the laughing stock of liberal pundits worldwide. Why go through so much effort to destroy such a woman? Well it's because she doesn't fit the mold. Here is a woman who is pro-life (liberals hate these types) and pro gun (liberals really hate them) who has more executive experience than 'The One' and has a down syndrome baby. They hate her because she is not a product of their woman's liberation efforts, and people like her must be destroyed at any cost, thus the increase in the cases of PDS. (Palin derangement syndrome, it's real folks don't let it happen to you)